Self-defense or road rage? Utah Supreme Court hears arguments in case involving self-defense law

May 8, 2023, 10:17 PM | Updated: 11:04 pm

SALT LAKE CITY — Utah’s Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in the first appellate challenge involving a 2021 self-defense law.

The case in question stems from a shooting in 2019. Jon Michael Clara fired several shots toward a truck that had repeatedly rammed into the SUV he was driving. One of the bullets flew through the cab of a nearby uninvolved vehicle, narrowly missing a child.

The case is one of several the KSL Investigators have followed after first reporting on unintended consequences of the new law.

Case background

“He made the wrong call,” assistant solicitor general Andrew Peterson argued Monday.

Representing Clara, defense attorney Ann Taliaferro pointed out, “it was three seconds.”

The three seconds she’s referring to is part of a video that was captured by a dash camera inside Clara’s vehicle. Seven shots can be heard during those three seconds, after his SUV spun around and came to a rest facing oncoming traffic.

A blue truck with a snowplow rammed into an SUV multiple times, spinning it around to face oncoming traffic on Nov. 23, 2019.

Investigators never determined who was driving the truck, but Clara faced felony firearm charges for shooting at it.

Clara said he saw brake lights and feared the driver was turning around to come after him and his passenger again.

“I was just aiming to let him know, if you come back this way, you know, you’re gonna get shot,” he testified during a hearing in November 2021.

Clara made use of a new self-defense law he urged lawmakers to pass.

House Bill 227 sailed through the Utah legislature in 2021. It allows people who are charged with a crime and claim self-defense to have a justification hearing before the case goes to trial. If prosecutors cannot disprove a self-defense claim with clear and convincing evidence in that early hearing, the case is permanently dismissed.

That is what happened in Clara’s case, last year. In March, 3rd District Judge Todd Shaughnessy ruled the state had not met its burden of proof, and despite evidence he said “troubles” him, he dismissed the case.

“This case is, in the court’s view, a classic case that should be decided by a jury,” he said.

In an unusual move, the judge urged prosecutors to challenge his decision.

“This is one instance in which the state can appeal,” Shaughnessy said. “I would encourage the state to do that to seek some clarity on exactly what this new law means. But, as I say, I believe my hands are tied.”

Third District Judge Todd Shaughnessy presiding over a hearing in Clara’s case on March 4, 2022.

Utah Supreme Court arguments

Peterson argued Clara didn’t actually shoot in self-defense.

“I think this is like every other case that this court and the court of appeals have reviewed, where somebody vindictively shot somebody in the back under a theory of, ‘I’m going to do him before he does me,’ or some species of that or based on previous threats,” Peterson said during Monday’s oral arguments. “Previous threats are never enough. This court’s case law is very clear about that.”

“The fact that he may have been shooting and he missed, or he was just shooting to warn them off or to stop the truck from coming back, I think that’s still absolutely justified,” Taliaferro said.

She also addressed the stray bullet that traveled through a nearby family’s vehicle.

“That wasn’t Mr. Clara’s fault,” she argued. “Mr. Clara was a victim here, too. And it’s not Mr. Clara that maybe caused danger to somebody else. It’s this assailant that kept ramming this truck.”

‘This could be a consequence’

In addition to questions about Clara’s case, some justices asked general questions about procedure under the new law and several questions about a scenario in which there is no witness to a murder, the suspect submits a claim of self-defense under the new law, but refuses to testify, which is within their Fifth Amendment right.

“At least now, at the pretrial conference, you have some — or the pretrial hearing — you have some proffered facts,” Taliaferro said. “So actually, that’s better for the state because now they’re not going to be surprised at trial with the self-defense.”

“They’re never going to get to trial, because it’s going to be dismissed under the statute,” Justice Diana Hagen responded.

Jon Michael Clara (left) and defense attorney Clayton Simms (right) participate in a virtual hearing on March 4, 2022.

She said that scenario represents a potential unintended consequence of HB227.

“I don’t know what the legislature intended,” Hagen said, “but it seems like this could be a consequence, whether intended or not.”

Supporters of the law argue that if the state cannot meet its burden of clear and convincing evidence in a pretrial hearing, it certainly cannot meet its heftier burden of beyond a reasonable doubt at trial, therefore, the case should be dismissed.

But Justice Paige Petersen pointed out that under the murder scenario, it would be much harder for prosecutors to prevail during the pretrial hearing that it would in a trial, where cross-examination of the defendant would be an option available to them.

“I think that would make a great movie or crime novel,” assistant solicitor general Peterson said of the scenario. “I don’t think it’s likely to be a common problem.”

Justice Petersen then shared the facts in the hypothetical Utah scenario are those of a real case in Florida, challenged under the statute that Utah’s self-defense law is modeled after.

“We have that in Jefferson v. State in Florida,” Petersen said. “It’s the exact hypothetical I gave. The defendant gave a story about why he stabbed his roommate. The state had no evidence about what happened in the apartment. And so just based on his story, case dismissed.”

While Taliaferro argued the district court was correct in dismissing the case against Clara, Peterson urged the justices to reverse the prior ruling.

A court spokesperson said it will likely be several months before the court issues its written opinion.

Have you experienced something you think just isn’t right? The KSL Investigators want to help. Submit your tip at investigates@ksl.com or 385-707-6153 so we can get working for you.

KSL 5 TV Live

KSL Investigates

Wendie Muhic is the frustrated owner of a 2007 Chevy Tahoe, that dies a lot....

Matt Gephardt & Sloan Schrage

West Jordan car owner says odometer fraud has left her stuck paying thousands on a lemon she can’t drive

Wendie Muhic is the frustrated owner of a 2007 Chevy Tahoe that dies a lot. Now she is left paying for it.

3 days ago

Woman texting...

Matt Gephardt

How crooks use texts to get your money, identity, or both.

If you used a mobile phone for any length of time, it’s likely you have gotten text messages that seem like an honest mistake that innocuous-looking text might have come from a scammer.

4 days ago


Daniella Rivera and Keira Fairmont

Treat and Release: How Utah weighs the risk of repeat sex offenders

The KSL Investigators examine Utah’s corrections system, responsible for treating and releasing people who commit sex crimes.

4 days ago

Viewmont High School softball field...

Matt Gephardt and Cindy St. Clair

High school softball team calls foul on field conditions, 2 years after Title IX complaint

The Viewmont High softball team played its 2023 season on a field with dead, patchy grass and none of the improvements promised by the school district. Why weren’t required upgrades completed? Matt Gephardt investigates.

5 days ago

Mechanic works on a car...

Matt Gephardt

Driver apathy keeps tens of thousands of unsafe cars on Utah roads

Every year, the vehicle history report business Carfax releases its study on how many cars are on the roads with unfixed safety recalls.

6 days ago


Mike Headrick and Cindy St. Clair

AI Revolution: The past, present, and future of artificial intelligence in Utah 

The world of AI is only as limited as human imagination. So how do you interpret artificial intelligence and its applications in your life? Mike Headrick investigates.   

6 days ago

Sponsored Articles

Asian little girl playing arcade game on the computer machines at the shopping mall outlets...

Get Out Pass

Family Fun Activities in Utah You Have to Try This Summer

These family fun activities will entertain you all summer, so if you ever feel stuck in a rut wondering what to do, refer to this guide!

Woman IT specialist in elegant suit working on notebook computer in data center next to server rack...

Les Olson

Your Complete Guide to Outsourcing IT Services

This guide covers everything you need to know about the different benefits of outsourcing IT services to meet your small business needs.

diverse group of friends dance outside under string lights...

Lighting Design

5 Frequently Asked Questions About Outdoor Lighting

Read for the most frequently asked questions about outdoor lighting to help narrow the search for your home.

Stack of old laptops with dark background...

PC Laptops

Old Laptop Upgrades You Need to Try Before Throwing it Away

Get the most out of your investment. Try these old laptop upgrades before throwing it out to keep it running fast and efficient.

Happy diverse college or university students are having fun on their graduation day...

BYU MBA at the Marriott School of Business

How to Choose What MBA Program is Right for You: Take this Quiz Before You Apply!

Wondering what MBA program is right for you? Take this quiz before you apply to see if it will help you meet your goals.

Close up of an offset printing machine during production...

Les Olson IT

Top 7 Reasons to Add a Production Printer to Your Business

Learn about the different digital production printers and how they can help your company save time and money.

Self-defense or road rage? Utah Supreme Court hears arguments in case involving self-defense law