Supreme Court preserves law that aims to keep Native American children with tribal families
Jun 15, 2023, 8:14 AM | Updated: 11:35 am
FILE - The Supreme Court is seen in Washington, on Nov. 5, 2020. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday preserved the system that gives preference to Native American families in foster care and adoption proceedings of Native children, rejecting a broad attack from Republican-led states and white families who argued it is based on race.
Indian Child Welfare Act, which was enacted to address concerns that Native children were being separated from their families and, too frequently, placed in non-Native homes.
Tribal leaders have backed the law as a means of preserving their families, traditions and cultures.
The Supreme Court upheld a federal law to protect Native children from being removed from families or tribes for fostering or adoption.#ICWA was enacted in 1978 after thousands of Native minors were forcibly placed in residential schools or homes with no tribal connections. pic.twitter.com/QXJn2xkNMN
— AJ+ (@ajplus) June 15, 2023
The “issues are complicated” Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for a seven-justice majority, but the “bottom line is that we reject all of petitioners’ challenges to the statute.”
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, with Alito writing that the decision “disserves the rights and interests of these children.”
Congress passed the law in response to the alarming rate at which Native American and Alaska Native children were taken from their homes by public and private agencies.
BREAKING: Supreme Court delivers win for Native American families in adoption case.
The ruling says the law that gives preference to Native Americans in the adoption process does not discriminate on the basis of race, as challengers argued. https://t.co/AOlzdW4BQY
— NBC News (@NBCNews) June 15, 2023
The law requires states to notify tribes and seek placement with the child’s extended family, members of the child’s tribe or other Native American families.
Three white families, the state of Texas and a small number of other states claim the law is based on race and is unconstitutional under the equal protection clause. They also contend it puts the interests of tribes ahead of children and improperly allows the federal government too much power over adoptions and foster placements, areas that typically are under state control.
The lead plaintiffs in the Supreme Court case — Chad and Jennifer Brackeen of Fort Worth, Texas — adopted a Native American child after a prolonged legal fight with the Navajo Nation, one of the two largest Native American tribes, based in the Southwest. The Brackeens are trying to adopt the boy’s half-sister, now 4, who has lived with them since infancy. The Navajo Nation has opposed that adoption.
BREAKING NEWS: ICWA is upheld by the Supreme Court. Native families are PROTECTED!!! ❤️ #news #Native #NativeAmerican #Indigenous #ProtectICWA #supremecourt #win #upheld #ICWA #ChildrenBack #EverythingBack pic.twitter.com/QtSubI2hhQ
— Association on American Indian Affairs (@IndianAffairs) June 15, 2023
More than three-quarters of the 574 federally recognized tribes in the country and nearly two dozen state attorneys general across the political spectrum had called on the high court to uphold the law.
All the children who have been involved in the current case at one point are enrolled or could be enrolled as Navajo, Cherokee, White Earth Band of Ojibwe and Ysleta del Sur Pueblo. Some of the adoptions have been finalized while some are still being challenged.
Native adoptions can give priority to tribal families, Supreme Court rulehttps://t.co/xHAfLw71ku pic.twitter.com/DyRjBSwlkz
— Navajo Nation President Jonathan Nez 2019-2023 (@NNPrezNez) June 15, 2023
The high court had twice taken up cases on the Indian Child Welfare Act before, in 1989 and in 2013, that have stirred immense emotion.
Before the Indian Child Welfare Act was enacted, between 25% and 35% of Native American children were being taken from their homes and placed with adoptive families, in foster care or in institutions. Most were placed with white families or in boarding schools in attempts to assimilate them.
