Supreme Court considers when the government can block followers on social media

Oct 31, 2023, 2:13 PM

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday will consider when the government can block followers on social m...

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday will consider when the government can block followers on social media. (Drew Angerer, Getty Images)

(Drew Angerer, Getty Images)

(CNN) — The Supreme Court grappled with the intersection between the internet and the First Amendment Tuesday as justices considered when government officials can block followers on social media.

During three hours of arguments, the justices made clear that while they may not be active on sites such as Facebook, they understand their ultimate opinion will shape how public officials from the local level all the way to the White House use their accounts to communicate with constituents and potential voters.

Several of the justices noted that there are First Amendment implications for both a public official who retains the right to maintain a personal account and followers who find themselves blocked when the official disagrees with their comments.

“That’s what makes these cases hard,” Justice Elena Kagan said at one point. First Amendment interests are “all over the place.”

Triggering First Amendment concerns

They probed what kind of posts could convert a public official’s private account into state action that would trigger First Amendment concerns and limit an official’s ability to discriminate on the basis of a commenter’s viewpoint.

“I’m not a Facebook person,” conservative Justice Clarence Thomas declared, but he went on to express some concern that if the definition of government action is broadened too much, it would serve to “reduce the speech of public officials” in a potentially dangerous way.

Chief Justice John Roberts worried that attempting to “disentangle” an official’s private life and public job on a personal page, doesn’t reflect the reality of how social media works.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who said she was going to continue calling the website “X” by its previous name “Twitter,” lamented that sometimes personal and professional interests are too “intertwined.”

Justice Brett Kavanaugh queried if a government official could post information such as a road closure, for instance, or if that would trigger constitutional limitations.

Big argument avoided in the past

The Supreme Court dodged a major dispute two years ago on the intersection between government officials, social media users and the First Amendment when it dismissed a case concerning then-President Donald Trump’s habit of blocking individuals from Twitter who had expressed their displeasure with him.

The justices ultimately opted out of that dispute because Trump had left office and there was no longer a live case or controversy to decide.

On Tuesday, although Trump was not a party to the cases at hand, his name came up. Kagan noted that he seemed to “be doing a lot of government on his Twitter account” while president.

“I mean,” Kagan said, “sometimes he was announcing policy.”

Tuesday’s arguments are the first of several important upcoming cases about social media at the court.

What’s coming next

In the coming weeks, justices will hear a dispute about two state laws that could have nationwide repercussions for how social media companies display user generated content. The court will also consider lower court rulings that severely limit the ability of the White House and others in the Biden administration to communicate with social media companies about content related to Covid and elections the government views as misinformation.

“If a public official uses a social media account as an official forum, whether for engaging with constituents, transacting business, or for other uses related to the office, then they’re a state actor, to whom the First Amendment applies, just as if they were standing at a door deciding who should be allowed into a public meeting relating to their duties,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law.

“But just as government officials go home at the end of the day, their social media can also be personal –- to which the Constitution does not and should not apply,” Vladeck added. “The trick in these cases is drawing the line between what’s official and what’s personal, especially for officials who use the same accounts for both.”

In one case, James Freed, a city manager in Port Huron, Michigan, had a Facebook account that was originally private and limited to his personal friends. But the account became so popular that Freed converted it to a public page that anyone could follow. He listed his profile as “public figure” and described himself as: “Daddy to Lucy, Husband to Jessie and City, Manager, Chief Administrative Officer for the citizens of Port Huron.”

The account contained personal details about his life – such as photos of his daughter’s birthday – but also his work in Port Huron. During the Covid pandemic, for example, he shared Port Huron’s policies on public health measures.

An individual named Kevin Lindke objected to the COVID-19 policies and posted his criticism. Freed eventually blocked him and Lindke responded by filing suit under federal law that allows a person to file suit against a state actor when the individual believes his federal rights have been violated.

Lawyers for Freed argue that even though their client was a governmental official, his posts did not constitute state action subject to First Amendment concerns because the social media page was not part of his official duties. A federal appeals court agreed. It held that Freed’s page “neither derives from the duties of his office nor depends on his state authority” and that he did not “fulfill any actual apparent duty of his office.”

“In short,” the panel of judges on the 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals held, “Freed operated his Facebook page in his personal capacity, not his official capacity.” The court said that if Port Huron’s list of city-manager’s responsibilities mentioned operating a Facebook page to tell residents about city initiatives it might be a “different story.”

A different argument

Another dispute concerns two members of California’s Poway Unified School District Board of Trustees, Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff and T.J. Zane. They created public Facebook and Twitter pages to inform constituents of what was happening in the district.

But two parents, Christopher and Kimberly Garnier, began commenting on the social media pages with long criticisms of the district. O’Connor-Ratcliff and Zane blocked them, and the Garniers filed suit seeking damages and arguing that the officials’ postings amounted to government action.

The public officials lost at the federal appeals court level.

“We conclude that, given the close nexus between the Trustees’ use of their social media pages and their official positions, the Trustees in this case were acting under color of state law when they blocked the Garniers,” a panel of judges on the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals held.

The court made clear that although the social media accounts were not required by the trustees’ positions, the accounts were “directly connected” to their jobs. While not every social media account created by a public official is subject to constitutional scrutiny, the court added, “when state actors enter the virtual world and invoke their government status to create a forum” for expression, “the First Amendment enters with them.”

KSL 5 TV Live

National News

FILE: Hollywood actors have reached a tentative agreement with the major film and television studio...

Ramishah Maruf and Elizabeth Wagmeister, CNN

Hollywood actors union ratifies new contract with studios

Members of SAG-AFTRA, the Hollywood actors union, have ratified a new contract with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, which represents major studios and streamers, the union said on Tuesday.

3 hours ago

President Joe Biden, here on June 1, sets off on a fundraising sprint Tuesday as he looks to tap in...

Kevin Liptak, David Wright and Samantha Waldenberg, CNN

Biden tells donors he’s ‘not sure I’d be running’ in 2024 if Trump wasn’t in the race

resident Joe Biden told Democratic donors Tuesday he wasn’t confident he’d be seeking another term if his predecessor Donald Trump wasn’t running for the White House.

4 hours ago

FILE - Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, talks to rep...

KEVIN FREKING Associated Press

Senate approves hundreds of military promotions after GOP senator ends blockade of nominees

The Senate in a single stroke has approved about 425 military promotions after Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama ended a monthslong blockade of nominations over a Pentagon abortion policy.

8 hours ago

Women hold signs at rally supppo...

PAUL J. WEBER Associated Press

Pregnant Texas woman asks a court to let her have an abortion under exceptions to state’s ban

A pregnant Texas woman whose fetus has a fatal diagnosis is asking a court to let her have an abortion. Attorneys for 31-year-old Kate Cox say they believe the lawsuit filed Tuesday in Austin is the first of its kind in the U.S. since Roe v. Wade was overturned last year.

8 hours ago

FILE - Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., speaks during a news conference at the Capitol in ...

Holmes Lybrand and Haley Talbot, CNN

House Speaker Johnson wants to blur January 6 footage to protect Capitol rioters

The Louisiana Republican said during a news conference that he wants to make sure rioters don’t get prosecuted.

8 hours ago

Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. speaks during a campaign event at Independence Mall, ...

Michael Houck

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. files lawsuit against Utah for ‘unconstitutional early deadline’ practices

Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has filed a federal lawsuit against Utah's state officials limiting his presidential bid on Monday.

10 hours ago

Sponsored Articles

Stylish room interior with beautiful Christmas tree and decorative fireplace...

Lighting Design

Create a Festive Home with Our Easy-to-Follow Holiday Prep Guide

Get ready for festive celebrations! Discover expert tips to prepare your home for the holidays, creating a warm and welcoming atmosphere for unforgettable moments.

Battery low message on mobile device screen. Internet and technology concept...

PC Laptops

9 Tips to Get More Power Out of Your Laptop Battery

Get more power out of your laptop battery and help it last longer by implementing some of these tips from our guide.

Users display warnings about the use of artificial intelligence (AI), access to malicious software ...

Les Olson

How to Stay Safe from Cybersecurity Threats

Read our tips for reading for how to respond to rising cybersecurity threats in 2023 and beyond to keep yourself and your company safe.

Design mockup half in white and half in color of luxury house interior with open plan living room a...

Lighting Design

Lighting Design 101: Learn the Basics

These lighting design basics will help you when designing your home, so you can meet both practical and aesthetic needs.

an antler with large horns int he wilderness...

Three Bear Lodge

Yellowstone in the Fall: A Wildlife Spectacle Worth Witnessing

While most people travel to this park in the summer, late fall in Yellowstone provides a wealth of highlights to make a memorable experience.

a diverse group of students raising their hands in a classroom...

Little Orchard Preschool

6 Benefits of Preschool for Kids

Some of the benefits of preschool for kids include developing independence, curiosity, and learning more about the world.

Supreme Court considers when the government can block followers on social media